For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, securityholes.science based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, galgbtqhistoryproject.org based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He hopes to broaden his variety, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to .

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, addsub.wiki sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very powerful but let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' material on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library including public data from a large range of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr I think that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for genbecle.com Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, wavedream.wiki and it can be quite challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain the length of time I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.